Cricinfo



Cricinfo Registration

home Cricinfo 3D Audio Video Photos Fantasy Slogout Help and Feedback

 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v England
Sth Africa v Bangladesh
Australia v New Zealand
Zimbabwe v Sri Lanka
Champions Twenty20
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



ICC could be dragged into row

PCB formally rejects England's compensation claim

Cricinfo staff

October 11, 2006



Inzamam-ul-Haq leads his side back onto the field ... but too late to save the Test © Getty Images
As expected, the Pakistan Cricket Board has formally rejected a request for compensation lodged by their English counterparts following the abandonment of August's Oval Test.

The ECB had asked for around $1.3 million (£800,000) to cover its losses after Pakistan refused to resume playing on the fourth day of the match. The board refunded all fifth-day ticketholders and also gave a 40% reimbursement to the 23,000 in the ground on day of the abandonment.

While talks continue between the boards, there seems little chance of any progress. The PCB maintains that the actions of the umpires were to blame for the resulting refusal by Pakistan to resume the match, and as the employers of the officials, the ICC is responsible for the losses. "We have said in our letter that the Oval Test not being completed is a case of cause and effect," Saleem Altaf, the PCB's director of operations was quoted as saying. "The 'cause' was when umpire Darrell Hair accused our team of ball-tampering and the 'effect' was our team refusing to play the match.

"The ECB should realise that we have been vindicated in our stand on ball-tampering, which led to the effect. They should contact the person responsible for the effect." Altaf's comments did not take into account that Inzamam-ul-Haq was found guilty and punished for bringing the game into disrepute by refusing to play after tea.

If stalemate ensues, then the ECB can ask the ICC to intervene, and the matter is sure to be raised at the board of directors meeting in Mumbai next month.

The ECB would be within its rights to insist on consistency from the ICC. The English authorities had to pay £250,000 to the Zimbabwe board when an ODI in 2004-05 was cancelled because the Zimbabwe authorities refused to allow journalists into the country. It was also hit with a hefty fine when England refused to play in Harare during the 2003 World Cup.

If the ICC decided to pay then there may well be objections from other member countries as ultimately world cricket would be footing the bill for the Pakistan team's actions.

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England special edition just launched
Test your knowledge
    Fantasy cricket: India v England, Australia v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile

Cricinfo Mobile


Related Links



In Focus

Stories

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Video: our daily SportsCenter round-up
Watch on cricinfo.tv
Fantasy: Ind v Eng, Aus v NZ & SA v Bangladesh
Enter your teams now
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
The Cricinfo Quiz - India v England edition
Take the challenge now
 
Sponsored Links
09 Cricinfo Guide to International Cricket
Order now at Cricshop
Bet now on the Ind v Eng, Aus v NZ & SA v Bang
Fixed odds at bet365
The best online rugby coverage - Scrum.com
Site just re-launched
Follow the 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories